Heat Pump Water Heaters: Design Details
How Heat Pump Water Heaters Work
Single-stage HPWHs
Two-stage HPWHs
Applications
Designing HPWH systems
Financial Comparisons
The Bottom Line on HPWHs
Single-stage HPWHs
Two-stage HPWHs
Applications
Designing HPWH systems
Financial Comparisons
The Bottom Line on HPWHs
What do you see when you look at a building’s exhaust air stream, a restaurant kitchen so hot that the cook faints, or a commercial laundry where the workers are made miserable by heat and humidity? At Wescor we see hot water, cool air, and energy savings.
Air-to-water heat pump water heaters (HPWHs) can capture the latent and sensible energy from a building’s exhaust air or the ambient air in warm environments such as commercial kitchens and laundries and transfer the energy to water, providing:
- potable hot water
- cool air for air conditioning
- energy savings
How Heat Pump Water Heaters Work
Heat pump water heaters extract latent and sensible heat from air and use the extracted energy to heat water. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a HPWH system.
Figure 1 Heat Pump Water Heater System
The HPWH cools in-coming warm air by approximately 20ºF, with air-cooling capacity approximately 70% of water-heating capacity. The water is heated approximately 10ºF with each pass through the HPWH, with compressor energy adding to water heating.
There are two types of HPWHs: single-stage systems and two-stage systems.
Single-stage HPWHs
Single-stage HPWHs use an air-to-water heat pump and are effective down
to 40ºF.
A single-stage HPWH can both heat and cool water (if it has a reversing
valve), and it can cool air without heating water (if it has a remote
condenser).
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram for a typical single-stage HPWH.
Figure 2 Single-stage HPWH
Single-stage HPWHs are sized from 50K to 500K BTUHs and typically come
as a complete packaged system.Capacity and Efficiency
The primary factors that determine a heat pump water heater’s efficiency are:- the supply air wet bulb (WB) temperature
- the desired final water temperature
The heating coefficient of performance (COP) is the ratio of the HPWH’s heat energy to the electrical energy input when both are in consistent units.
Figure 3 shows the COP of a typical single-stage HPWH at various air temperatures.
Figure 3 COP for a Single-stage HPWH at Various Air
Temperatures
Figure 4 shows the capacity of a typical single-stage HPWH at various
air temperatures.
Figure 4 Capacity of a Single-stage HPWH at Various Air
Temperatures
Capacity is mainly a function of compressor BTU rating and air
temperature.
Figure 5 shows the capacity of a typical single-stage HPWH at various
entering water temperatures (EWT).
As shown, EWT has little effect on capacity.
Figure 5 Capacity of a Single-stage HPWH at Various
Entering Water Temperatures
Table 1 compares the performance of a single-stage HPWH capturing heat
from various sources: a commercial kitchen, a building’s exhaust air
stream, and the average outside air temperature for one year and for the
month of January in Portland, Oregon.
Table 1 Make-up Domestic Hot Water Performance Estimator
| HPWH specs |
Heat sources | ||||
| Commercial kitchen |
Building exhaust |
Portland avg annual temp |
Portland avg January temp |
||
| Nominal capacity at 72o WB (BTUs per hour) | 500,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 |
| Design WB | 72o | 80o | 63o | 55o | 40o |
| Avg input water temp | 100o | 100o | 100o | 100o | 100o |
| Supply water temp | 55o | 55o | 55o | 55o | 55o |
| Set point temp | 140o | 140o | 140o | 140o | 140o |
| % rated capacity | 100% | 111% | 89% | 78% | 58% |
| COP at design WB | 3.47 | 3.81 | 3.10 | 2.76 | 2.13 |
| Delivered BTU per hour | 503,800 | 557,000 | 443,950 | 390,750 | 291,000 |
| Recovery rate gal per hour | 714 | 790 | 629 | 554 | 412 |
| Gallons per 8-hour run | 5,713 | 6,316 | 5,034 | 4,431 | 3,300 |
| Gallons per 18-hour run | 12,854 | 14,211 | 11,327 | 9,970 | 7,425 |
Cost per mmBUT* (assumes $.10 KWh and $1.40 therm) |
|||||
| WH series HPWH | $8.43 | $7.69 | $9.46 | $10.62 | $13.76 |
| 95% efficient gas WH | $14.74 | $14.74 | $14.74 | $14.74 | $14.74 |
| 85% efficient gas WH | $16.47 | $16.47 | $16.47 | $16.47 | $16.47 |
| 100% electric WH | $29.30 | $29.30 | $29.30 | $29.30 | $29.30 |
Two-stage HPWHs
A two-stage HPWH is an air-to-water heat pump (first stage) feeding a water-to-water heat pump (second stage). Two-stage HPWHs:- Can operate in lower air temperatures than single-stage HPWHs.
- Maintain BTU capacity.
- Have higher total boost.
- Use staged operation for efficiency.
Figure 6 Two-stage HPWH
The first stage operates alone until the air temperature drops to about
40ºF, when the second stage kicks in.
A two-stage HPWH can operate effectively to15ºF.
Even at that low temperature, heating water to 140ºF is easy.
Figure 7 shows the COP of a typical two-stage HPWH at various air
temperatures.
Figure 7 COP for a Two-stage HPWH at Various Air Temperatures
Applications
Applications with typical entering water temperature (EWT) of 100ºF (so-called “hot water” applications) include:- Potable hot water
- 120-140ºF space-heating radiators
- Process water for areas such as laundries, kitchens, and industrial applications
- Lower water temperatures resulting in much higher COP.
- Two-pipe boiler/chiller loops (50-90ºF)
- Pool heating (80-90ºF)
- Radiant floor heating (70-100ºF)
- Even better pay-back
- Same BTUH de-rating curves for air temperatur
Figure 8 COP for a Two-stage HPWH at Various Entering Water
Temperatures
The following three sections list conditions to consider for three typical environments-—building exhaust air, commercial kitchen, and commercial laundry—-when deciding whether a HPWH is suitable for a particular application.
Building Exhaust Air
energy source
A building exhaust air stream is typically a constant 63ºF WB.
For example, if there is 96,000 cfm from roof exhausts, then
approximately 3.4 mm BTUH of recoverable heat is available 24/7.
buffer and backup
If the building is using a boiler/cooling tower for heating and
cooling a water loop, then the loop volume can provide the primary
buffer storage with the gas boilers providing additional heat.
cooling
The HPWH in this example could provide approximately 220 tons of
cooling, which could be enough to eliminate cooling tower cost.
heating performance
In this example, the system has a 4.4 COP at loop temperature of
90ºF and a 6.3 COP at loop temperature of 50ºF.
size
Depends on building heating and cooling requirements.
Commercial Kitchen
energy source
A commercial kitchen’s supply air is typically 80ºF+ near the
ceiling.
buffer and backup
An existing or new tank provides water storage; gas or electric
water heaters provide additional heat.
cooling
Air ducted to spot-cool areas directly reduces AC load.
heating performance
COP > 4 (half the cost of gas per BTU).
size
Hot water use is based on meals per day and varies by type of
kitchen:
Fast food: 46 kBTU per 100 meals.
Full service and cafeteria: 160 kBTU per 100 meals.
Fast food: 46 kBTU per 100 meals.
Full service and cafeteria: 160 kBTU per 100 meals.
Laundries (commercial, athletic club, motel, hotel, etc.)
energy source
Ambient air from dryer or drain trough area.
buffer and backup
Electric tank for pre-heated water. Gas water heaters provide additional heat and high temperature.
cooling
Can provide spot cooling or full-time cooling with a remote
condenser.
heating performance
COP > 3.5.
size
Typical hot water use is one to two gallons per pound of laundry.
Designing HPWH Systems
When designing a HPWH system, you need to consider three things: design strategies, environmental conditions, and hot water use.Design Strategies
Use the following strategies when designing a HPWH system.- Use the HPWH for base demand with a conventional HW heater for back up.
- Trade off buffer storage capacity and dynamic source capacity to meet peak demand.
- Size the system for a minimum of eight hours per day run time.
- Use the cool air the HPWH produces to increase ROI.
- A separate remote condenser allows cooling when water heating is not needed.
Environmental Conditions
Consider the following environmental conditions when designing a HPWH system.- Energy source
- Is the air source too hot (WB over 95º)?
- Is the heat source constant or variable?
- Is unconditioned or outside air sufficient?
- Air flow
- Typical air flow is about 2500 cfm per rated 100k BTUH.
- Can cooled, dehumidified air be used for cooling a room or process?
- Buffer storage
- Requirement is based on the difference between peak and base loads. For example, an application that has a two-hour peak load in the morning and a two-hour peak load in the evening needs larger buffer storage than an application where use is consistent throughout the day.
- Usually 50-200 gallons storage capacity per 100k BTUH is needed as a buffer.
- Capacity
- Best to choose a HPWH with a BTUH where the run time is greater than 50% of the operating time.
Hot Water Use
Table 2 is a handy water-use guide from the 2007 ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications (Chapter 49, Table 7).
Table 2 Water Use Guide for Various Types of Buildings*
| Type of Building | Maximum Hour | Maximum Day | Average Day** |
| Men's dormitory Women's dormitory Motel: 20 units 60 units 100 units |
3.8 gal/student 5.0 gal/student 6.0 gal/unit 5.0 gal/unit 4.0 gal/unit |
22.0 gal/student 26.5 gal/student 35.0 gal/unit 25.0 gal/unit 15.0 gal/unit |
13.1 gal/student 12.3 gal/student 20.0 gal/unit 14.0 gal/unit 10.0 gal/unit |
| Nursing home | 4.5 gal/bed | 30.0 gal/bed | 18.4 gal/bed |
| Office building | 0.4 gal/person | 2.0 gal/person | 1.0 gal/person |
| Full-meal restaurant, cafeteria Drive-in, grille, luncheonette, sandwich, snack shop |
1.5 gal/max meals/hr 0.7 gal/max meals/hr |
11.0 gal/max meals/hr 6.0 gal/max meals/hr |
2.4 gal/max meals/hr 0.7 gal/max meals/hr |
| Apartment building: 20 units 50 units 75 units 100 units >200 |
12.0 gal/apt 10.0 gal/apt 8.5 gal/apt 7.0 gal/apt 5.0 gal/apt |
80.0 gal/apt 73.0 gal/apt 66.0 gal/apt 60.0 gal/apt 50.0 gal/apt |
42.0 gal/apt 40.0 gal/apt 38.0 gal/apt 37.0 gal/apt 35.0 gal/apt |
| Elementary school Junior, senior high school |
0.6 gal/student 1.0 gal/student |
1.5 gal/student 3.6 gal/student |
0.6 gal/student 1.8 gal/student |
**Per day of operation
Financial Comparisons
As shown in Table 3, HPWHs have a lower first cost, higher annual energy savings, and shorter payback time than solar options. The incentive information in Table 3 is specific to Portland, Oregon. Available grants and incentives vary by location. ContactWescor’s Portland office for information about grants and incentives available in specific locations in Oregon and Idaho and Wescor’s Seattle office for information on locations in Washington.
Table 3 Financial Comparisons of Various Solar and HPWH Options

Heat pump water heaters transform waste heat or ambient air into hot water and air conditioning
| Heating option |
Energy use | Cost and incentives | Savings and payback | ||||||||
| Annual energyproduced |
Annual electric expense |
First cost | BETC* pass thru |
ETO E.B.** |
Federal credit |
Net equip price |
Heating only | Heating and cooling | |||
| Annual savings |
Payback years |
Annual savings |
Payback years |
||||||||
| Added to condensing boilers |
Therms | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Solar thermal 8000 sqr ft |
10,100 | $1,825 | $1,000,000 | $350,000 | $60,600 | $300,000 | $289,400 | $11,305 | 25.6 | No cooling |
No cooling |
| Solar thermal 2000 sqr ft |
2,525 | $456 | $250,000 | $87,000 | $15,150 | $75,000 | $72,350 | $2,826 | 25.6 | No cooling |
No cooling |
| HPWH 8 hrs/day |
12,963 | $12,248 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $12,963 | NA | $62,037 | $4,604 | 13.6 | $16,852 | 3.7 |
| HPWH 12 hrs/day |
19,445 | $18,372 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $19,445 | NA | $55,555 | $6,906 | 8.0 | $25,279 | 2.2 |
| HPWH 18 hrs/day |
29,168 | $27,559 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $29,168 | NA | $45,832 | $10,359 | 4.4 | $37,918 | 1.2 |
| HPWH 24 hrs/day |
38,890 | $36,745 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $35,000 | NA | $40,000 | $13,812 | 2.9 | $50,557 | 0.8 |
| Added to electric boilers |
kWh | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| HPWH 8 hrs/day |
379,696 | $12,248 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $35,000 | NA | $40,000 | $25,721 | 1.6 | $37,970 | 1.1 |
| HPWH 12 hrs/day |
569,544 | $18,372 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $35,000 | NA | $40,000 | $38,582 | 1.0 | $56,954 | 0.7 |
| HPWH 18 hrs/day |
854,317 | $27,559 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $35,000 | NA | $40,000 | $57,873 | 0.7 | $85,432 | 0.5 |
| HPWH 24 hrs/day |
1,139,089 | $36,745 | $100,000 | $25,000 | $35,000 | NA | $40,000 | $77,164 | 0.5 | $113,909 | 0.4 |
**Energy Trust of Oregon Existing Buildings Program
The Bottom Line on HPWHs
Properly applied and installed, HPWHs save energy in almost every situation.The most cost-effective way to heat water. Because heat pump water heaters use electricity to move heat from one place to another rather than generating heat directly, they can be two to seven times more energy-efficient than conventional water heaters. That means that HPWHs can produce the same amount of hot water using less then half the amount of energy as conventional water heaters.
The best ROI with the shortest payback. As shown in Table 3, a typical HPWH application has a short payback time—as low as five or six months. Compare to solar thermal, which can have a payback time of 25 years or more.
Significantly lower first cost than solar. Even with subsidies, solar is approximately two to five times more expensive than HPWHs, with less annual energy savings.
Captures and recycles waste energy. In applications such as building exhaust air and commercial laundries and kitchens, HPWHs let you capture heat energy you have already paid for and recycle that energy back into hot water demand (and cool air for air conditioning).
Effectively reduces natural gas use and carbon footprint. For example, a continuous 500,000 BTU-demand HPWH reduces carbon emissions by 77.5 tons per year.
Whether you want to save the environment, save money, or both, HPWHs are as green as it gets.
Contact Wescor for additional information on
heat pump water heaters
